[fab] [Fwd: What is the mkisofs license?]
Rahul
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Mon Aug 14 17:23:39 UTC 2006
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rahul wrote:
>> Tom Callaway wrote:
>
>>> We don't need to analyze Extras for FSF license compliance, IMHO.
>
>> The packaging guidelines changes if any would affect both the
>> repositories and the distribution on the whole includes both. Not sure
>> why you would consider excluding Fedora Extras.
>
> AFAIK, no one has proposed/sugggested so far that Fedora's packaging
> guidelines require FSF license compliance (instead of simply
> opensource.org ) yet.
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-April/msg00170.html
I have independently done the same to the board. I would like to know if
others support this or not.
Rahul
Rahul
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list