kernels in the packaging universe
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Sat Dec 23 16:06:36 UTC 2006
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:55:19PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 11:51 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> > Personally, I'm voting for "don't bother".
> >
> > This is a bad idea. We're encouraging fragmentation, and discouraging
> > the proper upstream path.
>
> Absolutely.
+1
> > If specific open source groups want to do
> > pre-upstream testing of kernel packages, let them make their own
> > unofficial repos. We'll link to them in our wiki.
>
> If we must. I think it's better to stick to "if it isn't upstream, it
> doesn't exist" though.
+1
> We should make it clear we don't want _any_ kmod packages in the new
> combined Core+Extras too.
Um, no. We've been over this before. Changing the location of code in a
SCM doesn't change any of the previous discussions. I don't particularly
like it, but *shrug*.
josh
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list