[fab] Fedora Project and Hosting
seth vidal
skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Fri Oct 20 14:26:58 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:23 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> I don't think it's as tough as that. For example, we should really have
> a git repo that fedora developers (including red hat folks!) can use.
> If nothing else, being able to interact with the kernel, x.org and a
> host of other projects is enough reason alone to just host that one thing.
>
> And I think that we don't have to worry about the whole big picture
> here. We're not trying to compete with sourceforge, nor should we try.
> But we should be facilitating individuals to get shit done. And a
> variety of SCMs do just that.
>
It also makes it so people have to chase down a bunch of different scm
tools just to be able to work on multiple projects in fedora.
That's sad-face-making, too.
Increasing complexity raises barriers to entry just as much as limiting
the complexity overly-much does.
There's a happy medium in there. One of every one isn't it.
-sv
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list