mailing-list reorganisation, round 4 on this list
Will Woods
wwoods at redhat.com
Tue Jan 9 16:25:57 UTC 2007
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 11:15 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Me again with the next round!
> === fedora-triage-list ===
>
> Not used much anymore; fedora-qa-list will take over the job (see below)
> === To -list or not to list ===
>
> Some of our mailing lists have the "-list" postfix, other not. I think
> all new lists should be created without it.
So, should this just be fedora-qa at redhat.com then?
I'm fine with closing fedora-triage-list - the fedora-qa list should
serve for all discussion of qa-related stuff (bug triaging, test tools,
testing status, etc.)
I'm also fine with fedora-test-list being repurposed for user discussion
of rawhide and other test releases.
But where should the automated reports that are currently sent to
fedora-test-list go? I haven't seen a consensus on that. I'd prefer they
stay out of the way of the discussion, so they'd have to be on a
different list (or, at least, really easy to filter out of fedora-qa..)
-w
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20070109/9813af9c/attachment.bin
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list