mailing-list reorganisation, round 4 on this list

Will Woods wwoods at redhat.com
Tue Jan 9 16:25:57 UTC 2007


On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 11:15 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Me again with the next round!

> === fedora-triage-list ===
> 
> Not used much anymore;  fedora-qa-list will take over the job (see below)

> === To -list or not to list ===
> 
> Some of our mailing lists have the "-list" postfix, other not. I think
> all new lists should be created without it.

So, should this just be fedora-qa at redhat.com then? 

I'm fine with closing fedora-triage-list - the fedora-qa list should
serve for all discussion of qa-related stuff (bug triaging, test tools,
testing status, etc.)

I'm also fine with fedora-test-list being repurposed for user discussion
of rawhide and other test releases. 

But where should the automated reports that are currently sent to
fedora-test-list go? I haven't seen a consensus on that. I'd prefer they
stay out of the way of the discussion, so they'd have to be on a
different list (or, at least, really easy to filter out of fedora-qa..)

-w


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20070109/9813af9c/attachment.bin 


More information about the advisory-board mailing list