mailing list reorganization

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 23:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 June 2007 12:52:00 Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> I'd like to point out that we can re-org the mailing lists without
> >> hosting it ourselves.  I just want to make sure the infrastructure team
> >> doesn't take on this, which is a pretty major task, just because 2 or 3
> >> people want it that way.  Is there general support from the FAB to host
> >> this ourselves?
> > 
> > I'm far more in favor of letting Red Hat to continue hosting the mailman 
> > stuff.  If we can do it with a different domain, great. 
> 
> I think this is the desirable path, atleast for now.
> 
> 1) If there is consensus on this, what are the steps involved? How long 
> would it take to get done?

f-infra-l question

> 2) Who is taking the responsibility of talking to Red Hat IT and getting 
> direct access to setup fedora mailing lists or getting and enforcing a 
> SLA from the team?

f-infra-l question

> 3) Do we want to move the domain and then do a reorganization or both 
> together?

I recommend both, and I think this is a usability question more than a
community-preference question.  That moves it from the realm of f-a-b
into ... golly, I dunno.  f-websites-l seems to be the group best
staffed to discuss usability issues ...

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20070608/6a0356a3/attachment.bin