governance, fesco, board, etc.

[Max Spevack]

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> * bodhi, koji are immature, semi-functional, semi-cooked pieces of SW 
> which still have to prove their longevity, but so far don't do 
> anything but introducing bureaucracy and are almost strangling former 
> FE.

So you want all of the infrastructural changes to be developed in the 
open, but you don't want there to be any hiccups or growing pains as we 
start to use them?

Doesn't the PROCESS ITSELF deserve any merit in your world?  Of course 
it still has to prove its longevity.  It's 3 weeks old!  But at least it 
exists.  2 years ago, parts of it existed, but the end result was just a 
dream.

Fedora eats its own dogfood.  That dogfood will get tastier over time.

And I question how semi-functional something like Koji is when an entire 
Linux distribution has built itself using it.  Seems pretty functional 
to me.  And I guess I should tell all the people I met at LinuxTag who 
have deployed Koji in their own environments, and told us how great it 
was, that they are wrong and it actually is a POS.

--Max