governance, fesco, board, etc.

[Michael Schwendt]

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:10:59 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:

> > * fedora-testing is a nothing but a hoax close blinding yourself about
> > QA - I consider it to be a dead born child. The best I can say about it
> > is it causing delays in updates.
> 
> I strongly disagree.  Tis a good thing updates-testing is optional, 
> you're welcome not to use it.

How?

Please document it.

Even the terminology around bodhi is confusing. I've had to "push" a
package. After more than a week there hasn't been any feedback about the
test update but another bug report about stock F7. Apparently in bodhi I
could mark the package stable myself without an idea of what procedures I
need to adhere to and saw an option to "unpush" it without any indication
of whether that refers to the test update or from where it would withdraw
the update. Apparently, announcements have been mailed, but without Cc,
and I still think Test Updates for F7 shouldn't be announced on
fedora-test-list, but on fedora-list.

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers

On the same day this Wiki page was modified with heavy layout changes,
I've lost the overview. I find this page increasingly difficult to read
and navigate. The strange table layout makes it worse. Usually, when
somebody asked me about where to find documents in the Wiki, I used to be
able to help or look up an entry-section quickly. That doesn't work
anymore. Meanwhile the page is crowded. Nobody with expertise on creating
quality web page seems to have the final say about it.