governance, fesco, board, etc.
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Wed Jun 13 12:40:24 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 06:50 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Reality check - What has changed with the merger?
Reality check - it's been a little over a month. It takes work to get
to a final solution.
> * Before: Core packages were maintained by @RH
> Now: With very few exceptions, Core packages are maintained by @RH
This will grow.
> * Before: FE was open, everybody could fix other packages.
> Now: ACLs are in effect.
ACLs can be removed if the maintainer wishes to make the packages fully
open again.
> * Before: Fedora consisted of free-OSS packages.
> Now: Non-free packages have been introduced.
By this do you mean firmware, or something else?
> * Before: Fedora was controlled by FAB and FESCO
> Now: Fedora is still controlled by FAB and FESCO.
> * Before: Core+Extras was released by RH's rel-eng
> Now: Core+Extras was released by a rel-eng.
No. Before: Core was released by RH's rel-eng. They didn't touch
Extras.
> * Before: FE had a functional work-flow, functional simple reviews,
> functional bugzilla, some bureaucracy, non-functional QA.
> Now: koji, bodhi, flagged-reviews, broken bugzilla, more bureaucracy,
> still non-functional QA.
I've seen you say this. I think I have seen other contributors agree
with some of those points. We're addressing them as fast as we can.
josh
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list