[Fwd: License issue with iText and releated packages]

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:28 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:

> Well, the FPC is supposed to do the clean-room design for guidelines
> and not police the packages, or put in different words, the FPC
> discusses the framework and the day to day packaging issues (enforcing
> guidelines, punishing guideline outlaws, deciding on exceptions to
> guidelines) are still within fesco proper.

Sounds reasonable to me.

Either way, a reminder is definitely in order.  Isn't there a cool new
announce list to cover this?  :)

- Karsten

-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20070621/e3aae3f9/attachment.bin