Policy on DST
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 21:47:55 UTC 2008
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:41:51PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Mike McGrath (mmcgrath at redhat.com) said:
> > with questionable payoff. We're global, UTC is globally recognized. No
> > it's not what time we use in our little bubble to ask our spouses what
> > time we'll be home for dinner but I think Fedora is bigger / more mature
> > then that.
>
> Yes, but... if any particular group is only in one timezone, or one DST
> area... why should they move their meeting?
>
> While we should certainly keep the schedule page in UTC, I'm not sure
> we should hold the users to fixed slots therein, as long as they
> keep it updated.
>
> As a contrast, I can definitely think of large global corporations who
> have multi-office meetings that stay at a particular fixed local time,
> even when DST changes.
That's more what I was getting at. This isn't about someone's meal
convenience but the fact that plenty of our volunteer contributors
take time out of their $DAYJOB to come to Fedora meetings. They have
their own professional schedules to keep, as do we who are lucky
enough to work on Fedora full-time. Thus my point about respecting
the human element of the local clock.
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20081203/3777c94a/attachment.bin
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list