Fedora Board Recap 2008-FEB-19

[Mike McGrath]

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 07:31:24PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, John Poelstra wrote:
> > >
> > > === Secondary Arch Hosting ===
> > >  * Can Fedora host binaries for secondary architectures?
> > >    * Change from original proposal
> > >  * makes it easier to get new mirrors and use mirror manager
> > >  * DECISION: board approves of Fedora hosting binaries for secondary
> > > architectures
> > >
> >
> > Any time frame on this?
> >
> > We don't currently have the infrastructure to do this and it would require
> > a pretty high upfront cost to start (3 netapp shelves for our primary
> > mirror setup).  If this is something we need soon (before FY09) I can talk
> > to netapp and see if there are any options there.
>
>
> Dennis's request was to host the rawhide binary trees, which are ~15GB
> each, not for the release ISOs.  With this understanding, and after we
> remove FC1-5, FE1-5, and the obsolete test releases (that'll free up
> 300GB), we should be OK.
>

Except that as of right now we don't have anywhere to put FC1-5 and FE1-5,
For this release I had planned on (if we needed it) moving F[C,E]2 to
archives if needed.  Is it ok to completely remove these trees or do we
have to (or want to) keep them available?

	-Mike