How to recognize contributor achievement (Re: LWN Subscriptions for Fedora contributors.)
Francesco Ugolini
fugolini at fedoraproject.org
Mon Feb 25 12:47:31 UTC 2008
2008/2/25, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Francesco Ugolini
> <fugolini at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Since the 1th FAmSCo we organize an Award program starting from an
> > Alex Meier (Ambs proj founder) arriving to the last FAmSCo. Yes, i
> > agree with a the idea of metrics, as you advice each sub project has
> > its metrics, ambassadors project, for his nature, has both a concrete
> > (events etc...) and personal metric (leadership in a country, etc...).
> > We are a really different project, because ambassadors aren't working
> > in the same place and each country has its events, smaller, for
> > example, than other one. If we choose a standard metrics we could cut
> > those people that, for example, are working great trying to prepare
> > online material or trying to organize their country IRC meeting. Not
> > only. We decide to use a metrics, how can we measure it for each
> > ambassadors? We haven't a tool to measure all ambs activities, both
> > live and offline.
>
> You've described is exactly why its important for each subproject to
> decide among themselves how to recognize contributors inside their own
> space of the larger Fedora project. You are absolutely right... for
> some types of important work we can't get hard metrics. I want them,
> the people on the Red Hat side of the fence like Max and Greg want
> them.. but we all know we can't always get them.
>
> I want to have a recognition framework that gives each subproject the
> freedom to nominate and recognize individuals in their group in a way
> that makes sense to that group. I don't even want to attempt to
> compare maintainers to ambassadors in some sort of ill-fitting attempt
> to compare people doing these very different things but doing them
> exceedingly well. Its apples to oranges...and I love both types of
> fruit.
>
> I want a state fair approach to contributor recognition, not a dog
> show approach. I want each the outstanding contributions to each
> category..each breed of contribution to get recognized. But I don't
> want to have "a best in show" award that gets all the attention and
> but is ultimately hollow in terms of serving to inspire the growing
> community of contributors to do their best work.
>
> I want a framework that Red Hat and potentially other entities (and
> even community individuals) can seed a small amount of resources into
> explicitly for recognition. Maybe in the future its more LWN
> subscriptions, or maybe its a gift certificate to Chile's, maybe its a
> book on curling strategy. The awards aren't really that important,
> compared to having a fair way to stand up people we know are important
> and give all of us an opportunity to thank them for doing their best
> work and helping us do ours. That's what's important and that sort of
> lifting up is only really possible by a group of peers who are in the
> trenches together getting stuff done.
>
> So in that sense what your group is already doing is a great model...
> not because of metrics or the lack of them.. but because you've agreed
> on a way of making that recognition happen.
>
> What we need to figure out at the larger Project level is how to build
> a framework that we can use to take that sort of recognition to the
> next level. So we can take the people each subproject chooses to lift
> up and embarrass them by making them externally and internally poster
> children for what it means to be a Fedora contributor.
>
> -jef"Did i mention a book on curling strategy would make an excellent
> recognition award... just want to make sure I mentioned that...cuz its
> important...books...on curling"spaleta
>
>
I agree with you about the framework idea and what you said about the
reason behind an award. Moreover i think, like you, that a recognition
don't have to be a problem but it has to be something that could
really move community in a certain way, following the best course.
Just a question: can this issue be discussed by the Fedora Board?
Regards
Francesco
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list