Planet material

[Seth Vidal]

On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Paul Frields wrote:

> We've had a few occasions over the past year where contributors have
> put questionable material on the Planet that doesn't reflect the
> Fedora Project's mission to lead the advancement of free and open
> source software and content as a collaborative community. To build
> that community, we should all be committed to "be excellent to each
> other." By creating an environment for constructive contribution, we
> can more effectively and successfully compare and challenge different
> ideas to find the best solutions for advancement, while building the
> size, diversity, and strength of our community.
>
> We have a diversity of backgrounds and values in our community, which
> is part of our strength. We don't want to unnecessarily restrict the
> audience of people who might become valuable contributors in the
> Fedora Project, and that means respecting each other viewpoints even
> when we disagree on particulars. We want the Fedora Project to be a
> constructive place for anyone to contribute without fear or worry.
>
> We want our contributors to feel welcome to express themselves, and
> not discourage controversial or critical opinions as long as they're
> offered in a constructive spirit of improvement. The privilege of
> posting on the Fedora Planet also includes a shared responsibility for
> all of us to respect our potential readers. To help our contributors
> understand how they can make constructive and community-friendly
> choices when sending blog posts to the Planet feed, I've drafted a bit
> of additional information on our Planet wiki page:
>
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Planet#Appropriate_Material

Why don't we let the hall monitors cover planet as well?

more or less same criteria and then we don't have to add 
yet-another-policy?

-sv