Requesting a Clear ELC Proposal
John Poelstra
poelstra at redhat.com
Tue Jul 21 16:50:31 UTC 2009
John Poelstra said the following on 07/21/2009 09:17 AM Pacific Time:
> I agree with Dimitris that we should be open to considering new ways of
> doing things and that progress and innovation often happen by getting
> out of our comfort zones. I also think that the board should be
> presented with enough information to make an informed decision. An
> informed decision requires specifics beyond "would the board be opposed
> to a particular 'idea'?"
>
> For me I keep coming back wanting to know exactly what it is that the
> board is deciding and what information we are using to make that
> decision. I think
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle is a good
> start, but the presentation format does not fit the context of the
> request (which too me is another problem)
> --https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/180
> The board does not review other feature pages that are not deemed
> features. Why has the board been asked to review this one? This
> information should be in the ticket when it comes to the board in the
> future.
>
> For your best shot at success (or at least to get my vote) I would
> suggest the following:
>
> o Create a formal proposal (discard the feature page format as it is
> confusing and doesn't work for this purpose)
Just to be clear.....as a wiki page where the canonical proposal can
always be found.
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list