Proposal for the new Fedora Project
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Oct 1 17:31:09 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/1/10 10:08 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 10/1/10 9:07 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>>> That shift would work just like the ASF works now perhaps with more focus
>>> on interoperability. We'd need project managers that manage each product,
>>> coordinate with other project managers. We'd turn Fedora into a community
>>> software factory. That stuff still needs to be packaged, but not as many
>>> people will be installing them.
>>>
>>>>> I'm curious, what are the actual tangible goals we can work on?
>>>>>
>>> Build framework, build apps for that framework. Email, communication.
>>> Build an online writer app, spreadsheet, etc. Get buy-in from other
>>> major communities (that's important).
>>
>> Since these things largely require resources we don't already have, why
>> can't we continue to use the resources we have to continue to produce
>> the OS (which will still be needed) while trying to get the other
>> resources needed to do the other things here you mention?
>>
>> Or to put it differently, what are we doing now that is getting in the
>> way of doing what you propose?
>>
>
> Nothing, I think we can and should do both, for at least several years
> when we can re-evaluate. Ultimately though I think we'll see a thinning
> of the desktop software we ship.
>
Ok, then I welcome your new efforts and wish you luck! Let me know if
there is anything I can do to help you with it :)
- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkymGtoACgkQ4v2HLvE71NW82QCfUZs05LKuUipRF1z1nahFH8Ub
vLIAoKc3tM115yvTTuA6daiJ/duYWl7o
=eZMi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list