Looking for feedback on Fedora COC Enforcement Draft

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:19:49 -0600
Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 13:17:00 -0500,
>   Ricky Zhou <ricky at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On 2011-03-02 12:12:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > It seems to be overly heavy handed way to make people aware of
> > > the policy. I'd rather see it treated like other policies people
> > > are expected to follow.
> > Is there any particular reason we don't want to be heavy handed with
> > making people aware of it?
> 
> I think being heavy handed results in a negative perception even if
> the policy is good. It also seems to set an expectation that people
> are bad by default. 

I have no problem personally with notifying people of the code of
conduct, but I don't think we should require them to explicitly click a
'I am signing this thing in agreement'. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20110302/81c15ffa/attachment.bin