Looking for feedback on Fedora COC Enforcement Draft

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:12:11 -0500
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Are you suggesting the FYI be added to the CLA change announcement, or
> part of the CLA signing (which I believe is done in the accounts
> system
> - though I might be wrong since I signed mine back in the days when we
> had to fax them)? 

The signing. (Although I suppose it could also be mentioned in any
announcement, this wouldn't get people down the road who come along by
itself). 

> I'm fine with not having people having to 'sign' an agreement for the
> COC (though maybe an acknowledgment that they read it would be nice),
> but I think just adding an FYI to the CLA announcement isn't enough
> since that would only ensure current contributors would see it, and
> not future ones. 

Agreed. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20110302/bbbd7968/attachment.bin