Improving the Spins process

Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Fri Oct 14 13:14:10 UTC 2011


Am Freitag, den 14.10.2011, 08:02 -0400 schrieb Paul W. Frields:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:28:01AM -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> > 2) While discussing some of the shortcomings of using wiki categories
> > to track progress on Spins, we also talked about the Features process
> > and how it too might benefit from using a ticketing system to track
> > progress of features.  As I understand it, Robyn (as the Fedora
> > Program Manager) already opens a FESCo ticket for each feature (so
> > that it's on the FESCo agenda), but uses wiki categories to track the
> > state (proposed, accepted, rejected, etc.) of each feature.  Is there
> > interest in moving the features process over to using tickets for
> > keeping track of the feature state, and keeping the discussion about
> > the feature in one easy-to-find location, rather than having it
> > scattered across talk pages, wiki pages, and FESCo meeting minutes?
> 
> Are you talking about a Trac instance that would be purely for feature
> tracking?

No, we'd use FESCo's trac. We already have a ticket for every feature
there anyway, but they just contain a link to the wiki page and are used
only for FESCo meeting agenda.

Regards,
Christoph




More information about the advisory-board mailing list