The Future of release names

Bruno Wolff III bruno at wolff.to
Thu May 10 13:11:48 UTC 2012


On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 13:14:32 -0500,
   inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Máirín Duffy <duffy at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> Anyway, please, please don't use artwork as support for the current
>> process - it is us artists ourselves who have been complaining loudly
>> about the current process and are harmed by it.
>
>I wasn't just to be clear. I recognize there is a conflict and only
>wanted to encourage the consideration of decoupling the two things
>rather than ask the community to pick a kind of tea every 6 months
>which I can't help but think will spoil the fun of the release naming
>process. But maybe a good way for both to work together will come out
>of the process too.

I'd rather see things go the other way. I think the design team should pick 
a set of candidate names that they think would work well for theming (then get 
pared down by legal) and then have FPCA+1 people vote for which name to use.


More information about the advisory-board mailing list