Fedora Board Recap 2012-09-26

[Peter Robinson]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Christoph Wickert
<christoph.wickert at gmail.com> wrote:
> Minutes:
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-26/fedora_board.2012-09-26-18.30.html
> Minutes (text):
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-26/fedora_board.2012-09-26-18.30.txt
> Log:
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-26/fedora_board.2012-09-26-18.30.log.html
>
> =====================================
> #fedora-meeting: Fedora Board Meeting
> =====================================
>
>
> Meeting started by Sparks at 18:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available
> at
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-26/fedora_board.2012-09-26-18.30.log.html
> .
>
>
>
> Meeting summary
> ---------------
> * Roll Call  (Sparks, 18:30:28)
>   * ke4qqq will not be here due to $dayjob requirements  (Sparks,
>     18:31:32)
>   * rbergeron is somewhere and the Internets are somewhere else
>     (Sparks, 18:32:58)
>   * Sparks, abadger1999, cwickert, gholms, inode0, and jreznik are in
>     attendance.  (Sparks, 18:36:18)
>
> * Agenda  (Sparks, 18:36:48)
>
> * Announcements  (Sparks, 18:37:40)
>   * Next Public Board IRC Meeting time/date confirmation: Wednesday,
>     October 10, 2012 @ 18:30 UTC  (Sparks, 18:38:36)
>
> * Open Q&A  (Sparks, 18:39:26)
>
> * Ticket #141: Keep better, open records of how Board members vote on
>   issues  (Sparks, 18:41:48)
>   * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/141   (Sparks, 18:41:55)
>   * IDEA: Have a new trac instance for things that can be discussed in
>     public.  (Sparks, 18:51:12)
>   * LINK: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/PrivateCommentPlugin   (gholms,
>     18:54:38)
>   * ACTION: cwickert to work with nirik to see if the Trac
>     PrivateCommentPlugin is a viable solution and bring back the results
>     to the next Board meeting.  (Sparks, 18:58:19)
>   * IDEA: Have a new board-public mailing list. This list should either
>     be moderated by board members or not open for posting (possibly that
>     also means subscription... not sure what mailman2 allows). Archives
>     are definitely public. Unless a discussion needs to be private,
>     discussion should occur here.  (Sparks, 19:02:13)

Isn't that what the advisory-board list is for? I'm not sure a 3rd
list is going to fix the problem.

>   * The goal of the board-public list would be for board members to be
>     able to carry on public conversations with minimal distractions that
>     currently occur on the board-private list  (gholms, 19:06:14)
>   * IDEA: We keep the lists the way they are now and really start using
>     the advisory-list more.  (Sparks, 19:30:44)
>   * 4 +1, 1 0, 1 -1  (Sparks, 19:33:42)
>
> * Release naming status  (Sparks, 19:39:35)
>   * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/146   (jreznik,
>     19:41:24)
>
> * Fedora 19 naming process  (cwickert, 19:41:53)
>   * AGREED: The F19 naming will go as normal and a yet-to-be-determined
>     naming schema will be used for F20  (Sparks, 19:52:30)
>
> * Open Q&A  (Sparks, 19:53:35)
>   * ACTION: everyone on the board should consider ticket 145 for next
>     week's meeting  (cwickert, 19:56:15)
>
> Meeting ended at 19:59:14 UTC.
>
> _______________________________________________
> advisory-board mailing list
> advisory-board at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board