a fedora council blog?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:03:31 -0400
Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:52:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > After a short while, it was determined that anything wordpress
> > > related was better run at an opensource friendly company which
> > > specialized in blogging software versus running it ourselves. If a
> [...]
> > Right, as smooge says there was once a wordpress-mu setup in
> > infrastructure. However, people really didn't use it much at all
> > and it was a pain to keep going with security updates, plugins,
> > etc, etc. So, we retired it and suggested people should move to
> > wordpress.com as they were open source and friendly and did this
> > for a living. 
> 
> This makes sense to me, but contradicts what Paul said. :)

Hum, I don't see what he said in this thread. Or was it somewhere else?

> Can we do everything we're doing on fedoramagazine.org that way? Not
> that we _have_ to do them both the same, but it kind of makes sense to
> consolidate.

You mean have fedoramagazine.org and a fedoracouncil.org blogs in the
same openshift instance? I think so, but I have not tried it. 

Note that for fedoramagazine, we proxy those requests. They hit our
proxy setup (and are cached) and then go to the wordpress site on the
backend. This was orig setup because it was the only way we could do
ssl / https for it. (which there is actually no need for really
anymore). 

> > Perhaps we should gather stakeholders and see what makes more sense
> > moving forward? Perhaps we could approach wordpress.com and ask them
> > for some N sites? Or if people are really using them and we have a
> > strong group of maintainers we could look at hosting them in
> > infrastructure again. 
> 
> Yeah that seems like a good approach.

ok. Will see about trying to gather people on the infra list or have a
one off meeting or something. 

> > Or I suppose we could just leave it with everyone
> > hosting their own stuff in openshift. 
> 
> We do happen to know some openshift experts around. :)

Indeed. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/council-discuss/attachments/20150416/03a84cf4/attachment.sig>