for discussion: Fedora OpenShift as an objective

Josh Boyer jwboyer at
Tue Sep 29 20:56:19 UTC 2015

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm at> wrote:

<snip good info>

> I think this is something on the order of an Objective rather than just
> a change/feature proposal because it's actually a rather tall order. On
> the technical side, currently OpenShift can't be easily packaged
> because it includes some 200+ Go libraries, and we don't even have
> approved Go packaging guidelines. This probably means we'd be asking
> for a very large bundling exception (note 'Active upstream Security
> Team' as part of the justification). On the less technical but still
> important side, I'd like to see related marketing and documentation,
> and coordination with Fedora Atomic and the Fedora Cloud WG, and
> possibly with Fedora Server as well (I know OpenShift node as server
> role is already under some consideration).
> Thoughts, comments, thrown vegetables?

Do you have someone in mind to lead this objective?  If so, is there a
reason they didn't propose this themselves?


More information about the council-discuss mailing list