[Design-team] F13 Artwork Process
mairin at linuxgrrl.com
Wed Oct 28 13:47:34 UTC 2009
On 10/28/2009 08:43 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 October 2009 10:59:52 Nicu Buculei wrote:
>> On 10/28/2009 11:33 AM, Martin Sourada wrote:
>>> I think the F12 schedule worked rather well, we slipped a few times a
>>> few days or a week and skipped most of the wallpaper refreshes -- I
>>> think it's unnecessary to have that many wallpaper refreshes. I've tried
>>> to keep in sync with our work the Key milestones  so you can compare
>>> what we did in time and when we did it.
>> A characteristic of this cycle was we had some *very good* designs *very
>> early* in the process, we got complacent about them and a long period of
>> inactivity occurred (this is why I think we missed refreshes).
>> Then close to the Beta we tried a refreshed look and post-beta due to
>> *some* fedback, a major and unexpected refresh occurred.
> Indeed! I totally agree with you. So we need more feedback - probably through
> more refreshes for alpha, more communication out of design team. It's really
> too late in time after beta (that's was one problem with F12 schedules - it
> was bad communicated what does it mean alpha and beta for F12 - beta is now
> practically final release, release candidate).
I don't understand how we could have communicated the alpha and beta
artwork any better than we did. We sent mails, we posted multiple blogs,
and I even posted on identi.ca and solicited people in IRC to give feedback.
It's really frustrating that folks wait until the very very last minute
to voice their opinion.
More information about the design-team