Richard Li wrote: > >> 3) As it has been hinted, we can expect OOo 2.0 to be boundled with >> it, does this means Core 2 will feature a JVM with it? If so, which? > > > OOo 2.0 will be built by gcj, which is FOSS. For more information, > search the archives. > > (I'm also assuming you mean Core 4, not Core 2.) > Yeah, sorry... My mistake. I meant Core 4...