Why is Fedora a multimedia disaster? - Here is why.

Dotan Cohen dotancohen at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 16:02:16 UTC 2007


On 18/04/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>
> > +1 this seems deserving of answer. I like Fedora, use it all the time,
> > and so rarely need a liveCD. And I am finding it harder to suggest
> > Fedora to newbies. The LiveCD doesn't seem like that's going to
> > change. I''m simply not suggesting any Linux since I'm only familiar
> > with Fedora. The LiveCD certainly has a cool factor. But in the
> > hypothetical scenario of a perfect LiveCD, what are the benefits? What
> > are the hypothetical use cases of said perfect Live Fedora?
>
> Live CD is useful since it is a single disk that you can distribute and
> get a reasonably good GNOME and KDE desktop. Perfect? no, but it is
> definitely getting better with every version overall.
>
>
> Rahul
>

What does it provide that Knoppix/Slax does not? Or is RH doing this
"because they can"?

Dotan Cohen

http://lyricslist.com/lyrics/artist_albums/603/a-camp.html
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/unix.html




More information about the desktop mailing list