Why is Fedora a multimedia disaster? - Here is why.

Arthur Pemberton pemboa at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 16:20:55 UTC 2007


On 4/18/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>
> > +1 this seems deserving of answer. I like Fedora, use it all the time,
> > and so rarely need a liveCD. And I am finding it harder to suggest
> > Fedora to newbies. The LiveCD doesn't seem like that's going to
> > change. I''m simply not suggesting any Linux since I'm only familiar
> > with Fedora. The LiveCD certainly has a cool factor. But in the
> > hypothetical scenario of a perfect LiveCD, what are the benefits? What
> > are the hypothetical use cases of said perfect Live Fedora?
>
> Live CD is useful since it is a single disk that you can distribute and
> get a reasonably good GNOME and KDE desktop. Perfect? no, but it is
> definitely getting better with every version overall.


Well that is only really half a reason, since  a live cd will likely
only have one DE. But one cd intalltion is the only real benefit i can
think of so far.

-- 
Fedora Core 6 and proud




More information about the desktop mailing list