New comps and full package list
jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Jan 15 19:43:39 UTC 2007
On Monday 15 January 2007 14:20, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by some of this, in the sense that the tools seem to
> be a bit overzealous in pulling in deps.
> For example, I don't see libdmx explicitly listed anywhere, and on a FC6
> machine, 'rpm -q --whatrequires libdmx' and 'repoquery --whatrequires
> libdmx' both only return libdmx-devel. But I also don't see
> libdmx-devel listed anywhere.
> So I'm not sure why it's in the big list.
See Bill and Jeremy's email, but in this case, many things (gdm included)
require something that libdmx provides:
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20070115/b9548603/attachment.bin
More information about the desktop