Some recent changes

[Bill Nottingham]

Rahul Sundaram (sundaram at fedoraproject.org) said: 
> > Odd, the wiki page says 9 and 7 people, respectively. (The Desktop SIG
> > page lists 11.)
> 
> Are you seriously suggesting that they are on the same level? 

No, I'm saying that when the XFCE and LXDE SIGs say they have 7-10 members
each, how am I supposed to know that they actually have only one or two
active development members, as you state? I'm not psychic.

> >> The kernel team could be doing things better.
> > 
> > And yet, you're not constantly badgering them. (Or the installer team,
> > or...)
> > 
> > That's what I'm talking about here - you and others are essentially holding
> > the Desktop SIG to a standard, of your creation, that moves over time, that
> > you don't actually hold anyone else to, including the SIGs you're actually
> > a part of!
> > 
> > I find that kind of hypocritical, toxic, behavior frustrating and silly.
> 
> I care about the desktop a LOT more than the kernel or installer. How is
> the hypocritical?

You stated that a group is 'clearly flawed and desperately in need of change'
when they're not following a process that you don't follow in your own SIGs.
I can't read that as anything other than hypocritical. If you care about it a
lot more, how about working to enact some of these changes (summaries to
fedora-devel-list, for example), rather than constantly complaining?

Bill