Unblock Avahi by default (for the Desktop live CDs)

Bastien Nocera bnocera at redhat.com
Wed Apr 14 12:44:27 UTC 2010


On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 16:11 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 13.04.10 15:04, Seth Vidal (skvidal at fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> >
> >>> What does that bug report to do with the firewall and the desktop live
> >>> cd?
> >>
> >> having avahi running and active by default.
> >>
> >> if various tools dep on the lib, then a system won't end up with avahi
> >> installed and running by default. The above is something of a surprise to
> >> many folks running servers.
> >>
> >> the comment from JH is the admin/manager of kernel.org who was a bit
> >> frustrated by avahi running as a service.
> >
> > Right. And what does that have to do with the firewall of the desktop
> > live cd?
> >
> > I mean, i am not opposed to introducing a seperate package for the avahi
> > libs, but i wonder what that has to do with the firewall of the desktop
> > live cd?
> >
> > And mentioning an admin's tale about a server is not really to the point is
> > it?
> >
> 
> Perhaps I misread the original comment - but it was the suggestion of 
> having avahi running by default.
> 
> Do you mean having that be the case from the livecd or from the package 
> itself.
> 
> If the former, then you're right it's a side issue. I thought the latter 
> was being discussed which is why I brought up that report.

Nope, it's the former that's being discussed.



More information about the desktop mailing list