Updates next steps

[William Jon McCann]

Hey Bill,

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awilliam at redhat.com) said:
>> I don't think that's actually correct. I haven't followed the latest
>> FESCo meetings closely, but if I recall it correctly, back when FESCo
>> first asked Bill Nottingham to take his proposal on enhanced updates
>> testing further, at the same meeting FESCo explicitly chose *not* to
>> move in the direction of trying to restrict updates by type or group
>> them. If I'm remembering wrong or FESCo has changed tack on this
>> recently, sorry.
>
> A slight clarification; it's not (AFAIK) that FESCo chose to not move
> that way, it's that they didn't choose any particular way to move. We
> may still move that way.
>
> What would be required would be some sort of actionable proposal to
> implement, which is what I would think this discussion could come up
> with.

Yeah my hope exactly.