comps changes for f15
awilliam at redhat.com
Sat Jan 15 11:36:54 UTC 2011
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:16 +0100, giallu at gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > one of the common themes of the F14 review cycle was ridiculing the lack
> > of an office suite on the desktop image, particularly given the presence
> > of 'useless' things like planner (I'm paraphrasing from the reviews, not
> > giving my own personal opinion). I know we have good arguments against
> > including an office suite, and I suspect planner is just in there as a
> > hangover from when we tried to include GNOME Office, but there does seem
> > to be a consistent impression in reviews that the current package choice
> > seems bizarre.
> Weren't those reasons related to lack of space in the LiveCD?
Yes, that's the reason. The thing I saw a lot of people say in reviews
is 'well they SAY it's because they don't have the space but then why do
they include a useless app like planner?!'. Apparently these people have
never heard of an oversight...
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the desktop