Request for review: new desktop groups

[Dan Williams]

On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 13:36 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bastien Nocera (bnocera at redhat.com) said: 
> > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 11:03 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:18 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > > As part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ReworkPackageGroups, I've
> > > > been working on redoing some of the groups that make up installation choices
> > > > in anaconda. The idea is to offer a simpler interface, where the user simply
> > > > selects which environment they want to run in, plus options for that
> > > > environment.
> > > > 
> > > > Based on what's in the kickstart file for the Desktop spin, here's what I
> > > > have for the Desktop:
> > > 
> > > NetworkManager-gnome is dead, having been replaced by both
> > > network-manager-applet and nm-connection-editor, among others.  At this
> > > point, the Shell is functional enough that we don't need
> > > network-manager-applet anymore for GNOME desktops.  But we still need
> > > nm-connection-editor.
> > 
> > We'll need it until we can get rid of fallback :(
> 
> OK, I will make the appropriate substitutions. As an aside:
> 
> *NetworkManager*{-glib,-openvpn,-vpnc,etc.}
> *network-manager*-applet
> *nm*-connection-editor
> 
> Not saying we need 100% consistency, but a little might be nice.

Would be  nice, and I tried to create "NetworkManager-applet" repos on
gnome.org when we moved the git repos there a few years ago, but for
whatever @%#%@# reason gnome.org has a policy of refusing StudlyCaps
repo names.  So I had to name the repo network-manager-applet.  And
since our package names follow our tarball names...

Dan