ABRT?

Jiri Eischmann eischmann at redhat.com
Mon Aug 11 11:09:22 UTC 2014


Michael Catanzaro píše v Ne 10. 08. 2014 v 12:27 -0500:
> On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 16:15 +0200, Richard Marko wrote:
> > As Jirka pointed out, retrace server is often overloaded to the point
> > that retracing of small coredump takes very long time. The machine
> > where
> > it's hosted is also being upgraded so this shouldn't be an issue when
> > the upgrade is in place.
> 
> Hey Richard and Workstation WG,
> 
> Reporting to Bugzilla is still extremely slow (I gave up on a report
> today after roughly 10 minutes of "preparing environment for backtrace
> generation). Unless this retrace server upgrade is coming very soon and
> is expected to produce an order of magnitude performance increase, then
> I think we should go ahead and disable reporting to Bugzilla in the
> meantime. We can do this by removing the gnome-abrt package while
> leaving the other abrt packages in place. Try this locally to see how it
> works -- ABRT will still process the crashes and send automatic crash
> reports to the retrace server, unobtrusively notifying the user when it
> has done so, but the problematic UI for reporting to Bugzilla will be
> gone.
> 
> There is one minor bug: once, by clicking on the notification in some
> particular way, I received a notification that said "Failed to launch
> abrt.desktop" (or something similar). It disappeared pretty quickly and
> I haven't managed to reproduce. Besides that problem, this seems like a
> good option to consider as the default for Workstation.

I heard at Flock that ABRT server should get some new machines from the
Fedora infra which should speed up the service significantly. Fingers
crossed :)

Jiri




More information about the desktop mailing list