Underlying DE for the Workstation product

[drago01]

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 February 2014 22:22, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
>> gummiboot really isn't suitable as a Fedora bootloader. Its inability to
>> read non-FAT filesystems is an absolute showstopper, as is its reliance
>> on LoadImage()/ExecuteImage() for starting the kernel.
>
> Hi, I'm somewhat of a UEFI newbie; could you elaborate a little why
> non-FAT is required [...]

Because Apple does not use FAT for UEFI partitons (they are HFS+).