[Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product

[Alex GS]

Where's appropriate place to post feedback?


On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Alberto Ruiz <aruiz at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 07:31 -0500, Alex GS wrote:
> > May I make a request?  Due to legacy I think MATE because it's based
> > on GNOME 2 should be included on that list.  That way you have all of
> > the GNOME bases covered.
>
> Alex, I appreciate your enthusiasm but I think for the "legacy" use case
> GNOME 3 Classic Mode covers this. We would end up having a redundant
> product if we ship both Classic Mode and MATE.
>
> If you have specific ways in which Classic Mode can be improved, the
> desktop team is happy to gather feedback and see if we can do something
> about it.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:12 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> > <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >         On 02/14/2014 06:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >                 Frankly speaking I think this is not subject to
> >                 discussion. KDE needs to
> >                 remain a release blocking desktop. Improving our
> >                 workstation product
> >                 should not happen at the cost of KDE or any other
> >                 desktop.
> >
> >
> >
> >         That should be fine KDE will be the only release blocking
> >         desktop since WG will have to handle that themselves ( or what
> >         ever DE ends up being voted as an WG product )
> >
> >         JBG
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --
> Greetings,
> Alberto Ruiz
> Engineering Manager - Desktop Applications Team
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
>
>
> --
> desktop mailing list
> desktop at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20140218/01e6f4bb/attachment.html>