technical spec for the workstation up for review

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:38:37AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> What I was guessing would happen would be that the 'product' WGs and the
> base WG would have the discussion in some other forum - a mailing list
> thread, a different wiki page, whatever - and the requirements formed as
> a result of that discussion would be a part of the base WG's
> specification, and the product specifications could then reference the
> base specification where appropriate.
> 
> Otherwise it seems like we'll wind up with something unwieldy like the
> base specification *and* each of the product specifications all
> containing the same text (or, worse, different text for the same
> requirements), which seems suboptimal.

I think it's okay for drafts / initial versions to look like this, and then
we can eventually collapse parts down to "#include base" or "#include foo
from base" / "include base except bar".



-- 
Matthew Miller    --   Fedora Project    --    <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>