GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers

[Ankur Sinha]

On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 18:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Fedora repos are multilib / multiarch (I always forget the right term)
> -
> i.e. there are select i686 packages *in the x86_64 repos*. coprs are
> not, I don't believe.

Yeah. Downloading the troublesome i686 rpms and installing them manually
lets the upgrade proceed normally. Should some sort of RFE be filed
against COPR for this?

Other than that, 3.12 from COPR works like a charm here.

# gsettings set org.gnome.shell disable-extension-version-validation true 

got some of my extensions to work, but some are still broken. I'll let upstreams know. 

I ran into an issue with a vala update. Bug filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067782

I'll keep an eye out for any other breakages. 
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20140221/a6f60c30/attachment.sig>