GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:45:32 -0800
Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 10:06 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:41:37 +1100
> > Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 08:49 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > > Agreed, perhaps a mail to the copr mailing list would be in
> > > > order.
> > > 
> > > I dropped a mail to the COPR mailing list. For the time being,
> > > setting up separate repos for x86_64 and i386 should work:
> > > 
> > > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/79449/93059786/
> > 
> > Enabling both on a x86_64 machine?
> > 
> > I don't think thats a good idea... mulitlib doesn't include _all_
> > 32bit packages in the 64bit repo, only some, so you could well get
> > conflicts doing that. 
> 
> Well, the 'obvious' thing would be for COPRs to follow the same
> multilib policy: if something's multilib in the base distro and you
> build it in a COPR, it gets multilibbed there too.

Well, I was answering the idea of just enabling both repos on a 64bit
system. ;) 

I don't know how hard it would be for copr to be multilib aware. It
would have to run mash or something over the two repos, so it could be
difficult/slow. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20140223/b9f517a9/attachment.sig>