[Proposal for Vote] Approve Draft 6 of the PRD

[Lukáš Tinkl]

Dne 15.1.2014 19:09, Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Lukáš Tinkl <ltinkl at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Dne 14.1.2014 15:41, Matthew Garrett napsal(a):
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 07:50:28AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Per our governance I'm calling for an official vote on the sixth draft
>>>> of the PRD that Christian has provided.  I've attached it again for
>>>> reference.  WG members have one week from today to vote.  Missing
>>>> votes after one week will be counted as abstains.
>>>
>>>
>>> This version still contains an explicit statement that the target
>>> audience is made up of developers. I've explained why I think this is
>>> damaging, and Christian obviously disagrees with me. However, I'm
>>> disappointed to see very little feedback from any other members of the
>>> working group.
>>>
>>
>> I'd also very much like to see the target group (or use cases) broadened in
>> a way to include content creators as well (think audio workstation, graphics
>> workstation, webdesign, etc.). So far it only lists (very explicitly) one
>> case for a student and 3 distinct sofware developer cases.
>
> Is that something we could perhaps add later?  In that we focus on
> what is there now, and then see what other use cases are already
> covered or almost covered?  I don't think the PRD is something set in
> stone, and I would think it will evolve over time.  Otherwise we risk
> just repeating being stuck on something.
>
>> Otherwise I agree with the listed plans and policies.
>
> For the purposes of clarity and record keeping, is that a +1 vote?
>
> josh
>

Yes, a +1. The PRD states somewhere at the beginning that it is an 
evolving document.

-- 
Lukáš Tinkl <ltinkl at redhat.com>
Software Engineer - KDE desktop team, Brno
KDE developer <lukas at kde.org>
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com