KDE integration/status for Workstation

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/05/2014 09:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Stephen Gallagher
>> <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 03/04/2014 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>> This with my Personal Opinion hat on, not representing QA:
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure all/most people who actually want to use Fedora
>>>> KDE are likely to be sold on doing it by downloading what they
>>>> will see as 'GNOME', installing that, and then installing KDE
>>>> on top of it. I think this will be fine for some folks, but
>>>> there'll be a significant constituency which just wants a KDE
>>>> image.
>>>>
>>>> In fact we might be creating a bit of a problem, because I can
>>>> see both "want KDE as an alternative desktop on top of the
>>>> Workstation product" and "just want Fedora KDE" as two entirely
>>>> legitimate and viable constituencies, which sort of means we've
>>>> just created a bunch of extra work for ourselves. I'm not sure
>>>> I see a clever magical solution to that, though. Engage brain
>>>> cells...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd suggest that for the Fedora Workstation, we declare that KDE
>>> is release-blocking *as an optional component atop the
>>> Workstation*.
>>
>> Please explain this further.  Having an optional component be
>> release blocking is making my head hurt.
>
> What I mean is that if I boot the live media, install from it and
> select "KDE" during that install process, then having a usable system
> after the post-install reboot is blocking.
>
> Is that more clear?

Er, yes and no.  I think I see what you're getting at though and that's fine.

josh