Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:34 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:23:59 -0700,
>   Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:15 -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> >
> >assigned a bug that's nominated as a blocker). We're probably going to
> >have to change that mindset in a .next world: we would already quite
> >*like* the expertise and input of folks outside QA/releng to the blocker
> >process, but in a world with Products with more domain-specific release
> >criteria, we're really going to need it.
> 
> It's hard to get people to commit that much time at once. Jumping in to 
> help with 1 hour meetings is a lot easier than 3 hour ones.

yeah, hence why this is more of an issue with the combined process. We
can try to group the bugs for the combined meetings, however.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net