[PATCH] Move captive portal to fedora-release-workstation

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 10:25 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 14:12 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > I don't really like that people that do upgrades get a worse
> > > experience because of that pointless change but well ...
> > 
> > There's nothing that says a user doing an upgrade wants to upgrade to
> > Workstation.  There's also nothing that is going to magically upgrade
> > them to Workstation anyway.  Also, they don't have this in F20 so
> > their experience is not worse, it's the same.
> 
> I think fedup needs to to require specification of the product when
> upgrading from Fedora 20:
> 
>  fedup
>    Error message listing the products
>  fedup --product=workstation
>    You get Fedora Workstation
>  fedup --product=server
>    You get Fedora Server
>  fedup --product=none
>    You get a collection of pieces from the Fedora repositories
> 
> Without that or some equivalent that keeps people from accidentally
> getting things that look approximately like Fedora Workstation but *are
> not* Fedora Workstation, I'm definitely opposed to this change.


I've been trying to work with the packaging folks and the fedup
maintainer, but right now it's looking infeasible to do a
non-productized (F20) upgrade to a Productized F21. People who want
Workstation are going to have to do a clean install. People upgrading
from F20 will end up with non-productized F21 (equivalent to a Spin).

I need to follow up on the original devel thread about this.

Basically, the fedup maintainers don't want to spend effort on a
one-time upgrade feature, particularly with so little time before
release.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20141001/588e5367/attachment.sig>