Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> That sounds workable, so long as someone's actually making sure we
> *do*
> comply with those. Has anyone checked that yet? I'd rather not throw
> it
> in the criteria and then have to fudge it immediately :)

Salutations,

A bit late I know, but I found three issues through the highly-advanced
testing process of turning on high contrast mode:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130794
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152792
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152796

Of the three, setroubleshoot is the only one that's potentially
problematic here, since somebody would need to make a new icon and
setroubleshoot is arguably important enough to block on (as opposed to
simply dropping it). We don't want OpenJDK Policy Tool. GNOME Logs is
easy to fix (but I think we do not want that, either).

If anybody finds more issues in the future, we can deal with them as
they come. I don't propose revising the guidelines or the release
criterion; that they cover these issues simply shows that they solve a
real problem for us (in this case, ensuring our high contrast support
does not regress).

Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20141014/4dd15e29/attachment.sig>