Workstation feedback on generic-release-workstation request?

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 16:18:21 -0400,
  Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 14:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154154 is a request to provide
>> a generic-release-workstation (sub)package in order to allow for
>> convenient remixing of a debranded Fedora Workstation.
>>
>> It seemed odd that firewalld-config-workstation would require
>> system-release-workstation and if this were to be done we'd need to be
>> sure not to break Fedora composes. I was hoping to hear some comments
>> from the workstation group in the ticket.
>
>firewalld-config-workstation requires system-release-workstation
>specifically to enable the creation of generic-release-workstation
>packages. (Both generic-release-workstation and
>fedora-release-workstation would Provides: system-release-workstation)

I was thinking that that was probably the case with using system in the 
name. Though I was also wondering why the dependency was there at all. 
(Though that is moot if it is OK to add a generic version.)