Third party repos
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu Feb 26 21:10:05 UTC 2015
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:58 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:37:55AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> > On Feb 26, 2015 6:57 AM, "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I wanted to resurface the third party repository topic before we
> > > get to next week's meeting. Currently we have the following
> > > page drafted that discusses the new disabled repo feature
> > > currently in Fedora 22 Workstation:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/3rdPartyApps
> > >
> > > Currently there's a policy from the Council (nee Board) on third
> > > party repos here:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Third_Party_Repository_Policy
> > >
> > > This policy doesn't address one of the problems I believe we're
> > > trying to solve in software -- making developer access to non-
> > > libre (but legally OK) tools on Fedora less convoluted and
> > > burdensome.
> > >
> > > So there's not just the question of implementation and curation,
> > > but also getting a policy change approved by the Council.
> > >
> > This would make more sense to me as a Change proposal, with all
> > the process
> > and publicity that comes with that. A change in Fedora like this
> > is much
> > greater than the actual implementation details; treating it like a
> > minor gnome-software feature add isn't representative of the
> > impact on the project.
>
> Except the Change process is focused on sorting out changes that
> make more than the owner do work to integrate, vs. those that don't.
> I think calling this a Change actually demote this to a purely
> technical decision, and I don't want to see it treated that way. So
> I think your suggestion achieves the opposite of what you intend.
>
Paul, you're describing a System-Wide Change there. What Pete is
describing is a Self-Contained Change, and this is exactly what those
sort of Changes are meant to account for.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20150226/8ce05df5/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the desktop
mailing list