Darktable Copr

[Debarshi Ray]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 10 September 2015 at 15:09, Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com> wrote:
> > * The user selects installation, and receives a notice that the
> >   application is not part of official Fedora repositories.
> 
> Isn't this a workaround for the FPC decision? It kinda means thousands
> of users are going to have problems upgrading to F23, and have to
> click a little button to enable a 3rd party copr (which can do pretty
> much anything to your system...) which will mean very little to most
> people.

It is, and this why I disagree with the rest of FESCo on this.

> Can't someone just tell the FPC they got it wrong in this case? FPC is
> not a useful thing if we're promoting workarounds for our default
> product.

FESCo could have overruled the FPC, but they chose not to [1].

Cheers,
Debarshi

[1] Since I was the only one in FESCo opposing this decision, I chose to
use "they" to refer to the committee, instead of "we".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/attachments/20150910/4be34363/attachment.sig>