Darktable Copr

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:38:11AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:45:50AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> >>2) The Design Suite is going to either (a) drop darktable (b) be dropped
> >>itself (c) massively overhauled to become a Fedora Remix.
> >>
> >>3) Still don't understand the F23 experience of installing darktable.
> >>
> >>In terms of user experience, this simply sucks and makes me feel like
> >>slavish adherence to obscure packaging rules is more important than our user
> >>base.
> >
> 
> On 09/10/2015 10:27 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >/me catches up with thread
> >
> >I'm not sure if 2(c) is necessary, if we have disabled repo support,
> >but I don't understand how that works with the upgrade process.  Need
> >moar clue?
> 
> A lot of us use design-suite as a package group and not a live image. My
> (perhaps flawed assumption) is that the disabled repo support wouldn't help
> in this case as darktable couldn't be included in the package group being
> from a different physical repo?
> 
> In the context of using design-suite as a package group... is there a way
> forward without doing it as a remix in a separate repo from the main fedora
> repos?

You're right -- the design-suite composition was not something I was
factoring in.  Overtaken By Events now (see earlier update to list),
but thanks for raising good points.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com