Requesting feedback for unaccepted Fedora features

[John Poelstra]

Dear Proposed Feature Owners,

The following feature pages are in CategoryProposedFedora9 which 
indicates that the feature owner is requesting that FESCo vote on them 
at the next meeting.  I have not raised these features to FESCo for a 
vote because certain parts of the pages are incomplete and it doesn't 
make sense for FESCo to review a feature when all the information is not 
present.

1) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GCC4.3 -- need a link to owner 
contact information; contingency plan and release notes sections are 
blank; need to discuss impact on mass rebuild of Fedora 9 (2008-01-02)

2) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EFI -- a few sections still 
need to be completed (2007-01-14)

3) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JigdoRelease -- some of the 
TBDs need to be completed, particularly "contingency plan" and 
"dependencies" (2008-01-03)

4) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureEncryptedFilesystems -- 
documentation and release notes sections are empty (2008-01-14)


In addition, the following features are targeted for Fedora 9 in their 
writeup, but are not in CategoryProposedFedora9.  If you have no 
intention of completing them for Fedora 9,
please remove Fedora 9 as the targeted release so that there is no 
confusion that it will not be in Fedora 9.  These features will never be 
raised for acceptance by FESCo.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureXULRunner
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureVolumeControl
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureRPMYumEnhancements
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewGdm
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RandrSupport
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ChristophWickert/FedoraLite
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFirstboot
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SecurityAudit
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PreUpgrade
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetworkManager-MobileBroadband
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HandwritingRecognizer

Thank you,
John