First date

Rodrigo Del C. Andrade fedora_rh at terra.com.br
Mon Sep 30 02:00:47 UTC 2002


	There a details button??! Hell, if it were a poisonous snake I would be 
suffering right now....

	Van


Tammy Fox wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 08:34:37PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> 
>>Hi all,
>>
>>So here comes my impressions on my first date with this Core
>>thing:
>>
>>
>>  * I decided not to install all packages, then I found that I
>>cannot select individual ones.  So I tried adding packages from
>>the add/remove program.  Then I selected my packages, and tried
>>to install them, when found that:
> 
> 
> I was able to select individual packages during installation by
> clicking the Details button.
> 
> 
>>	a) /dev/cdrom is pointed to /dev/hdc, this used to work
>>on previous Red Hats, but this time I had to calibrate it to
>>point to /dev/scd0.
>>	b) Even after that, the add/remove program cannot find
>>the CD there, and keeps asking for CD.  When I mount the CD, and
>>press Ok in the dialog, I find it unmounted..
> 
> 
> I ran into the same problem, so I filed bug #105947.
> 
> 
>>	c) I even couldn't copy/paste the list of selected
>>packages, so I wrote them down by hand, to feed them to up2date.
>>
>>
>>  * Then I proceeded with up2date, to install some new packages.
>>Then I got the following weird error.  Someone let me know if I'm
>>getting faked packages?
>>
>>Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
>>########################################
>>apel-10.6-1.noarch.rpm:     ########################## Done.
>>The package apel-10.6-1 is not signed with a GPG signature.
>>Aborting...
>>Package apel-10.6-1 does not have a GPG signature.
>> Aborting...
>>
>>
>>  * Bitstream-vera fonts are installed, but are not default.  It
>>was really hard to read the other fonts, after two months with
>>vera fonts from Ximian.  I took me a while to findout that they
>>are installed, and are available under name Bitstream Vera, not
>>Vera.
>>
>>  * Many many places here and there, there are still Red Hat's,
>>that should be replaced by Fedora equivalents.  One funny example
>>is the Login Screen chooser which has the thumbnail from Red Hat 9.
>>
>>  * Cool thing, DRI works!
>>
>>  * Nothing more yet.
>>
>>behdad
>>
>>
>>--
>>fedora-devel-list mailing list
>>fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 
> 





More information about the devel mailing list