Fedora Core 2 wishlists

[Chuck Mead]

Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:04:18AM -0500, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:14:59AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>>
>>>gnome 2.6
>>
>>While I don't want to discount this, I'd like to state here the
>>problem with it.  GNOME is basically on a 6-month cycle.  We are
> 
> ...
> 
>>So even if we were to pick up GNOME 2.6 this time, we would have
>>the same discussion every release until we bit the bullet.
> 
> 
> Apparantly I wasn't clear.  GNOME 2.6 is not overruled -- I just
> wanted to have the arguments for both sides on the table.  It is
> still very much an option worth discussing.

I am very much in favor of gnome 2.6 as well as inclusion of xfce!

-- 
csm
Lunar Project Leader
Disclaimer: "I am not a curmudgeon! No... really..."
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"